<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Blog Claim sucks (and its dangerous)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/</link>
	<description>Tips, tutorials and resources for software and web tools/applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:16:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Google&#8217;s penalizing of sites fair? &#124; TechZilo</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google&#8217;s penalizing of sites fair? &#124; TechZilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-462</guid>
		<description>[...] by indulging in link-exchanges. But there was no considerable uproar against it. People said that Technorati sucks, and moved on. So how does Google merit this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by indulging in link-exchanges. But there was no considerable uproar against it. People said that Technorati sucks, and moved on. So how does Google merit this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-456</guid>
		<description>@Karhik: Outlined already? Well, I did not really go over the documentation, but thanks. There is an advantage - when you hit publish, pings are sent to bots, and if they crawl before you remove it, your PR would drop because of unscrupulous linking (just kidding about PR part :D )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karhik: Outlined already? Well, I did not really go over the documentation, but thanks. There is an advantage &#8211; when you hit publish, pings are sent to bots, and if they crawl before you remove it, your PR would drop because of unscrupulous linking (just kidding about PR part <img src='http://www.techzilo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-460</guid>
		<description>I meant that I think this &quot;trick&quot; is already outlined by Technorati. I believe I read that while I was claiming mine. I used the same method,  to claim mine, but I don&#039;t think I went through with it after all. I guess there&#039;s no real advantage to doing it anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant that I think this &#8220;trick&#8221; is already outlined by Technorati. I believe I read that while I was claiming mine. I used the same method,  to claim mine, but I don&#8217;t think I went through with it after all. I guess there&#8217;s no real advantage to doing it anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-459</guid>
		<description>@Zac: Thanks, I too prefer the method, though there are some things you should know. Putting it in next post is fine, if you edit and remove it later. Why give a free link to them anyway? Besides, by the time you edit it, many search bots would&#039;ve been pinged by the auto-pings. They may index the page quickly, and take into account the ping. That is what concerns me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zac: Thanks, I too prefer the method, though there are some things you should know. Putting it in next post is fine, if you edit and remove it later. Why give a free link to them anyway? Besides, by the time you edit it, many search bots would&#8217;ve been pinged by the auto-pings. They may index the page quickly, and take into account the ping. That is what concerns me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-461</guid>
		<description>I prefer using the post claim, I just put the code into my next post.  It isn&#039;t a big deal then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer using the post claim, I just put the code into my next post.  It isn&#8217;t a big deal then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-458</guid>
		<description>@Karthik: It must be outlined by Technorati - I am just pointing out that they&#039;re trying to get an extra link from the blog(should the author forget to delete it) for post claim, and our username+pwd for the other claim, both of which are unacceptable. Hence the little trick of embedding in sidebar :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karthik: It must be outlined by Technorati &#8211; I am just pointing out that they&#8217;re trying to get an extra link from the blog(should the author forget to delete it) for post claim, and our username+pwd for the other claim, both of which are unacceptable. Hence the little trick of embedding in sidebar <img src='http://www.techzilo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/technorati-blog-claim-sucks-and-its-dangerous/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=148#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Am I mistaken or is this already outlined by Technorati?
Also, I believe you need to specify the XFN for the link too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I mistaken or is this already outlined by Technorati?<br />
Also, I believe you need to specify the XFN for the link too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
