Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to RSS feed or vai follow me sekojiet man on Twitter? on Twitter?
John Chow has been penalised heavily by Google, for link-bombing. John ēdamais sodīts stipri Google, par saikni bombardēšanu. He is now far behind the first page for both “John Chow” and “Make Money Online” search terms. Viņš tagad atpaliek pirmo lapu, gan "John Chow" un "Make Money Online" meklēšanas nosacījumiem. There's also reports that Google will drop his PageRank from the 6 to 4, in the next PR update. Pastāv arī ziņo, ka Google būs piliens viņa PageRank no 6 līdz 4 in nākamajā PR update.
For several months now, John Chow had been aggressively pursuing a linkback campaign, where he would link to any blogger who writes a review of his blog, and links to him with the link text “Make Money Online”. Jau vairākus mēnešus tagad, John Chow bija enerģiski īsteno LinkBack kampaņu, kur viņš ir saites uz jebkuru blogeris, kas raksta pārskatīt viņa blogu, un saites uz viņu ar saites teksts "Make Money Online".
Google has been known for frowning on paid links, paid reviews and other forms of link fraud or “gaming the system”. Google ir bijis zināms drūms par maksas saitēm, ko maksā pārskati un cita veida saikni krāpšanu vai "spēļu sistēma". Now, John Chow is on some 7 th page of results for “John Chow” on Google. Tagad, John ēdamais ir par aptuveni 7 th page of results for "John Chow" on Google. This is in addition for penalty for the result “Make Money Online”. Turklāt tas ir sods par rezultātu "Make Money Online".
Apparently, folks at Googleplex were not very pleased with the linkback campaign. Acīmredzot, folks at Googleplex nebija ļoti apmierināti ar LinkBack kampaņu. They have, however maintained that they do not rearrange the results manually to punish such fraud. Tomēr tās apgalvo, ka tie nav pārkārtot rezultātus manuāli, lai apkarotu šādu krāpšanu. They claim that their algorithm is smart enough to penalise such sites automatically. Viņi apgalvo, ka to algoritms ir pietiekami gudrs, lai sodītu par šādu vietu automātiski.
However, this incident of JC makes me think twice about such claims. Tomēr šai JC incidentu padara mani padomās divreiz par šādiem prasījumiem.
Matt Cutts, the “voice of Google”, who was critical of Google's policies like placing their own services Picassa and Blogger ahead of WordPress or Flickr in search results. Matt Cutts, "balss Google", kuri kritizēja Google politika, piemēram, laist savus pakalpojumus Picassa un Blogger pirms WordPress vai Flickr meklēšanas rezultātos. Thus, one would expect Matt to speak the truth. Tādējādi, varētu sagaidīt, Matt runāt patiesību. Matt Cutts, has however repeatedly echoed what Google says about their results. Matt Cutts, tomēr ir vairākkārt atkārtojas, ko Google saka par to rezultātiem.
Of course, Google has the right to rearrange their results. Protams, Google ir tiesības pārkārtot to rezultātiem. They had been something of a revoulutionary in the corporate sector, with the motto “Don't be evil” and the like. Viņi bija kaut revoulutionary in uzņēmumu sektorā ar moto "Vai nav ļaunums" un tamlīdzīgi. However, with this step, Google has gone back on all such promises. Tomēr ar šo soli, Google ir aizgājuši atpakaļ uz visiem šiem solījumiem. I personally agree with the dropping of JC on both searches, but this is more because of his evil methods. Es personīgi piekrītu atmešanu JC gan meklēšanas, bet tas ir vairāk, jo viņa ļaunuma metodes.
Which makes me wonder – does Google aspire to be the next Technorati? Kas padara mani brīnums - Google cenšas būt nākamais Technorati? Remember, Technorati attained notoriety for rearranging their “Top 100″ list of blogs, favouring some bloggers, while manually removing some others. Atcerieties, ka Technorati sasniedzis slikta slava par pārkārtojot savu "Top 100" sarakstā, blogi, atbalstot atsevišķus blogeri, bet manuāli noņemot daži citi. John Chow was at the receiving end of that too! John ēdamais bija saņēmēja beidzoties šim too! It was even criticised by the A-listers. Tas bija pat kritizēja-listers.
Now, Google, the search engine that we all love, seems to be heading the “Technorati way”. Tagad, Google meklētājs, ka mēs visi esam mīlestības, šķiet, ir pozīcijā "Technorati ceļā".
Related reading Related lasījums
- Technorati Blog Claim sucks (and its dangerous) Technorati Blog Claim sucks (un bīstamo)
- How To: Bring back Technorati incoming links widget in WordPress Dashboard How To: Bring back Technorati ienākošās saites widget WordPress Dashboard
- Search on Google from Firefox address bar (like Google Chrome) Meklēt Google Firefox adrešu joslā (kā Google Chrome)
- Happy Birthday, Google: Google is 10 years old Happy Birthday, Google: Google ir 10 gadus vecs
This is the problem if we have only one king. Šī ir problēma, ja mums ir tikai viens karalis.
I personally think that JC has crossed the line. Es personīgi uzskatu, ka JC ir šķērsojusi līniju. His blog has become out of focus because of his make money online post campaign. Viņa emuārs ir kļuvis no koncentrēšanās, jo viņa pelna naudu internetā pasta kampaņu.
PS I have launched my new blog. PS Es esmu sākusi savu jauno blogu. MeetArpit.com MeetArpit.com
@Nirmal: Yes, everyone is feeling the pinch of Google's domination….which gives me an idea for a new post – thanks, and watch out! @ Nirmal: Jā, visi ir sajūta šķipsnu Google dominē .... Kas dod man ideju par jaunu pastu - paldies, un skatīties out!
@Arpit: I was wondering why your blog has not been updated for quite some time now. @ Arpit: Man bija jautājums, kāpēc jūsu emuārs nav atjaunināts uz ilgu laiku. Now I know Tagad es zinu
Congratz on your new setup. Congratz par savu jauno setup. Finally, your “personal liking” to Blogger is over – welcome to WordPress side of blogging. Visbeidzot, jūsu "personīgi patika", lai Blogger ir vairāk - Welcome to WordPress pusē blogošana.
I predicted John Chow's demise some time ago. Es paredzams John Chow nāvi kādu laiku atpakaļ. Good on him. Labu viņam.
I am in favour with Google's Link Building Policy. Es atbalstu ar Google Link Building politiku. There are many website that manipulate the system and try to get a high ranking with wrong or missleading information on the topic user will search. Ir daudz mājas lapu, kas manipulēt sistēmas un mēģināt iegūt augsta ranga ar nepareizu vai missleading informācija par tēmu lietotājs meklēs.
There is something you should take care when you start the link building. Tur ir kaut kas jums būtu jārūpējas, startējot saite ēkā.
Get links from related website only. Iegūt saites no tīmekļa vietne only.
Links from Unique IPs and Domains Saites no Unikālo IP un Domains
Use Random Link Text Izmantojiet Random Link Text
Have a Good Interval on Link Building. Vai Laba intervālu Link Building.
John Chow got almost 3500 back links on google. John ēdamais ieguva gandrīz 3.500 atpakaļ saites uz Google. I was thinking, if it was blogspot site or hosted on google, they might have not taken it as a serious matter. Es domāju, ja tas bija blogspot vietā vai izvietots uz google, tie varētu būt, neņem to kā nopietns jautājums.
I also know, Google is very concerned about bad neighbourhood. Es arī zinu, ka Google ir ļoti norūpējusies par sliktu kaimiņvalstīs. So stop One minute to who you are going to link… Tā stop Vienu minūti, lai kas jūs gatavojaties link ...
@BlogBloke: Thank you for dropping by – I am honoured @ BlogBloke: Thank you for dropping by - Es esmu pagodināts
@BB and Linu: Both of you seem to hate JC. @ BB Linu: Abām Jums šķiet, ka ienīst JC. But the fact is, unlike many other A-listers, he gets things done quickly, and has proof. Bet fakts ir, atšķirībā no daudzām citām, listers, viņš kļūst lietas darīt ātri, un tam ir pierādījums. That's just about the only thing I like about him. Tas ir gandrīz vienīgā lieta, man patīk viņu.
But he's very arrogant – look for his post which comments on a blog who said he was big bad blog and Problogger was the third little site – JC claims he could've taken down PB, which is not very plausible, considering that D.Rowse's methods are more legit than JC's. Bet viņš ir ļoti augstprātīgs - meklēt savu amatu, kas par blogu, kurš teica, ka viņš bija lielais ļaunais blogu un ProBlogger bija trešais maz vietas piezīmes - JC prasījumu viņš varēja esam veikuši noteiktas PB, kas nav ļoti ticams, ņemot vērā, ka D. Rowse 's metodes ir vairāk legit nekā JC's.
@Linu: Thanks for the tips. @ Linu: Paldies par padomiem. #3, ie links from unique IPs, is new to me. # 3, ti, saites no unikālās IP, ir jauns man.
I must appreciate Sumesh, Man ir appreciate Sumesh,
Beside keeping the website with Fresh Content, he also often Keep the Blog with Fresh Themes… Blakus tur mājas ar svaigu saturu, viņš arī bieži Uzglabāt Blog ar Fresh tēmas ...
Many times, when I visit Tech Zilo, it makes me say WOW… seeing the New Theme… Daudzas reizes, kad es apmeklēju Tech Zilo, tas padara mani teikt WOW ... redzēt jaunu tēmu ...
Anyway… I feel freshhhhhhhhhhhhh Anyway ... Es jūtos freshhhhhhhhhhhhh
Was that a compliment? Bija tas, ka kompliments? If so, thanks. Ja tā, thanks.
But I feel you are indirectly telling me that I should stay with one theme – in fact, I am thinking of staying with this theme. Bet man šķiet, jums ir netieši stāsta, ka man vajadzētu palikt pie viena tēma - patiesībā es domāju palikt ar šo tēmu.
I don't hate anybody. Man nav naida ikvienam. But I can't respect someone like JC who games the system and encourages others to do so. Bet es nevaru ievērot kāds, piemēram, JC, kas spēles sistēmu un mudina to darīt citiem.
As far as Darren Rowse and other so-called a-listers go, he just saturates the internet with information that anyone can already find from Google. Ciktāl tas ir Darren Rowse un citu tā saukto-listers iet, viņš vienkārši piesātinātie internetā informāciju, ka ikviens jau var atrast no Google.
I call it CMP — Copy, Massage and Paste Es aicinu to CMP - Copy, Masāža un Ielīmēt
It's been fun and cheers everyone! Tas bija jautri un ovācijām everyone!
…BB ... BB
I respect John Chow for his ability to attract and retain visitors. Es cienu John Chow viņa spēju piesaistīt un noturēt apmeklētājiem. Apart from that, there isn't anything. Bez tam, nav neko.
Darren may saturate the net, but his methods are legit, and he presents the info in a readable manner. Darren var piesūcināt net, bet viņa metodes legit, un viņš sniedz informāciju, kas lasāmā veidā. You can't really deny the work he does Jūs varat ne īsti noliedz darbu, ko viņš dara
Also, he is a nice guy, atleast as far as my experiences are concerned. Arī viņš ir jauks puisis, atleast cik mana pieredze ir runa.
Well, Sumesh, I know you are doing experiment with deferent themes. Nu, Sumesh, es zinu, ka jūs darāt eksperimentēt ar izvadošs tēmām. This theme looks more vissible, easy to read content… Šī tēma izskatās vairāk vissible, viegli lasīt saturs ...
Yes, I like playing with things. Jā, man patīk spēlēt ar lietām. The problem is, they're too bland, or too flashy. Problēma ir, viņi ir pārāk maigs, vai pārāk uzkrītošs. I can't find any which are in between. Es nevaru atrast nevienu, kas ir pa vidu.
But I'll probably stay with this theme – it has 3col, right sidebars, readability etc. That's what I look for, in a theme. Bet es droši vien palikt pie šīs tēmas - tas ir 3col, tiesības sidebars, domas utt To es meklēt, jo tēma.
JC was penalized for not only link bombing but for paid links too,. JC tika sodīts ne tikai linku bombardēšanu, bet apmaksātas saites arī,.
As far is technorati is concerned , they have removed ~20 sites from their top 100 many of which are templates sites as if you have a template offering site, your blog will comparitively have a higher authority Ciktāl ir Technorati tas skar, tie ir izņemti ~ 20 vietas no 100 vispopulārāko no kuriem daudzi ir veidnes vietās, ja jums ir veidnes, kas piedāvā vietu, jūsu emuārā būs salīdzinoši ir augstākas iestādes
The case with JC is “make money online”.He made everyone link to him using these keyword and now he's out but it doesn't looks like he's affected Ar JC lieta ir "make money online." Viņš visiem saites uz viņu, izmantojot šos atslēgvārdu un tagad viņš noteikti, bet tas nav izskatās viņš ir ietekmējis
“Live by Google,Die by Google” "Dzīvi Google, Die by Google"
Why do everyone hate JC ? Kāpēc visi ienīst JC?
I too, mate, I too Arī es, māte, es arī
JC has really been hard hitted by google… JC patiešām ir grūti hitted Google ...
But it will have only marginal effect on him ..becoz he is even more popular than ever before because of everyone talking about him.. Bet tas ir tikai nenozīmīga ietekme uz viņu .. becoz viņš ir vēl populārāks nekā jebkad agrāk, jo visi runā par viņu ..
Hey Sumesh, something off topic. Hey Sumesh, kaut off topic. This new theme is pretty cool. Šī jaunā tēma ir diezgan vēss. Did you make it? Vai jūs veicat to?
The moment a corp thinks of world domination it becomes evil. Pašlaik corp domā par pasaules kundzību tā kļūst ļauna.
@Shyam: Thanks for dropping by. @ Shyam: Thanks for dropping by. Unfortunately, I'd have to disagree with you – Google thought up world domination some time back, and even now, they're are only one step into the evil world. Diemžēl, man ir vienisprātis ar Jums - Google izdomāja pasaules kundzību kādu laiku atpakaļ, un pat tagad, viņi ir tikai viens solis ļaunuma pasaulē. They're still doing good things like freeing up FeedBurner Pro services, adding robots.txt to Blogspot blogs etc. Viņi joprojām dara labas lietas, piemēram, atbrīvojot FeedBurner PRO pakalpojumi, pievienojot robots.txt uz Blogspot blogi uc
Good to be at techzilo ! Labi, lai būtu pie techzilo!
Evil is different from greed. Ļaunums ir atšķirīga no alkatības. Google may not be greedy but they are turning evil with online world domination plans. Google var būt kārs, bet tie ir pagrieziena evil tiešsaistes pasaules kundzību plānus.
By not encouraging competition (they just buy the competition off). Ne konkurences veicināšana (tie vienkārši pērk konkursa off). Creating monopoly is a bad business tactics take the example of standard oil ! Radīt monopols ir slikts bizness taktiku ņemt piemēru standarta eļļu!
They created monopoly to reduce the consumer cost. Tie radīja monopols, lai samazinātu patērētāju izmaksas. but in the process of doing so they was sued for Anti Trust and the company was split. bet to dara, lai viņi tika iesūdzēt tiesā par Anti Trasta un uzņēmumu sadalīja. (search wiki for Standard oil) (meklēt wiki paredzēti standarta eļļu)
Microsoft on the other hand is greedy and evil ! Microsoft otras puses, ir mantkārīgs un ļauns!
Nice analogy of Google's domination and monopoly in oil field Nice analoģijas Google kundzības un monopolu naftas lauka
Yeah, I agree with almost all you say – but I consider Google to be greedy too….After all, they're not acquiring YouTube etc. for charity – in long term, they envision earning big bucks from them. Jā, es piekrītu gandrīz viss, kas jums teikt - bet es uzskatu, Google ir mantkārīgs pārāk .... Galu galā, viņi nevar iegūt YouTube utt labdarības - ilgtermiņā, tie iedomāties pelnot lielas Bucks no tiem.
I think that Google, as the most popular search engine, has a responsibility to keep their results accurate. Es domāju, ka Google, kā vispopulārāko meklētājprogrammu, ir pienākums uzturēt to rezultātu precizitāti. It sure sounds like they're editing the results manually. Tā pārliecināts izklausās viņi rediģēt rezultātus manuāli. On the plus side, they do it a lot less than Yahoo (who accepts payment for results editing I believe). Par plus pusē, tie ir daudz mazāk nekā Yahoo (kas pieņem maksājumus uz rezultātiem rediģēšanas Es domāju).