<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Windows Registry hacks for improved performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/</link>
	<description>Tips, tutorials and resources for software and web tools/applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:16:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-5276</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-5276</guid>
		<description>Tweaking registry is definitely not for the faint hearted. It may render the systems unrecoverable if you are not careful. As a thumb of rule, do your backup first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweaking registry is definitely not for the faint hearted. It may render the systems unrecoverable if you are not careful. As a thumb of rule, do your backup first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bring yer&#8217; questions &#8216;ere</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Bring yer&#8217; questions &#8216;ere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] from learning new things by messing up with my father&#8217;s and grandfather&#8217;s desktops to registry hacking and tech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from learning new things by messing up with my father&#8217;s and grandfather&#8217;s desktops to registry hacking and tech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-107</guid>
		<description>@Edward: Thanks for the info on Tweak. However, I like to handle it directly, as any interface would limit the extent of customisation.

I am not a programmer, and have been dabbling with the registry for only 4 months. However, I&#039;ll try my best to explain. Registry is more like a static file, in that it can get heavily cluttered. Not fragmented, but cluttered. And when that happens, overall performance drops considerably. Also, it is not the limits that cause the trouble, but the efficiency. And you&#039;re not endangering the registry, but the whole OS.

&lt;span class=&quot;pbold&quot;&gt;Example&lt;/span&gt;: Remember, every time you do a fresh XP install, its quick, and as time goes by, it gets slower. The reason is that the programs you install add values to registry, and each of the values has to be brought to RAM at startup. The general sluggishness is also because of this reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Edward: Thanks for the info on Tweak. However, I like to handle it directly, as any interface would limit the extent of customisation.</p>
<p>I am not a programmer, and have been dabbling with the registry for only 4 months. However, I&#8217;ll try my best to explain. Registry is more like a static file, in that it can get heavily cluttered. Not fragmented, but cluttered. And when that happens, overall performance drops considerably. Also, it is not the limits that cause the trouble, but the efficiency. And you&#8217;re not endangering the registry, but the whole OS.</p>
<p><span class="pbold">Example</span>: Remember, every time you do a fresh XP install, its quick, and as time goes by, it gets slower. The reason is that the programs you install add values to registry, and each of the values has to be brought to RAM at startup. The general sluggishness is also because of this reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward L. Ries</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward L. Ries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I have a question about the registry that I&#039;ve sofar been unable to find. I&#039;m a programmer and I use the registry to store application settings. My latest program polls data from mutliple databases using an adodb connection. Potentionally the application could have dozens of entries. Each entry creates a new key for each connection. Each connection contains about 20 string values. That means that potentionally this application could be utilizing 12 keys * 20 entries = 240 entries. Is the registry built like a database or more like a static file? If I was storing information into a database I wouldn&#039;t be concerned by at what point am I endangering the registry either by it&#039;s limits or performance? Does the registry self expand? Does it become heavily fragmented?

I&#039;m mainly concerned about the comparison between the registry and a database. A database being able to alter data quite frequently and the registry?

Edward L. Ries, MCSE, A+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about the registry that I&#8217;ve sofar been unable to find. I&#8217;m a programmer and I use the registry to store application settings. My latest program polls data from mutliple databases using an adodb connection. Potentionally the application could have dozens of entries. Each entry creates a new key for each connection. Each connection contains about 20 string values. That means that potentionally this application could be utilizing 12 keys * 20 entries = 240 entries. Is the registry built like a database or more like a static file? If I was storing information into a database I wouldn&#8217;t be concerned by at what point am I endangering the registry either by it&#8217;s limits or performance? Does the registry self expand? Does it become heavily fragmented?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m mainly concerned about the comparison between the registry and a database. A database being able to alter data quite frequently and the registry?</p>
<p>Edward L. Ries, MCSE, A+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward L. Ries</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward L. Ries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Microsoft does offer a utility that allows for some customizing. It&#039;s called Tweak. It&#039;s not as customized as  an alternative registry but it does have a lot of otherwise undocumented features. Undocumented as far as the public is concerned. Search google for &quot;windows tweak&quot; and you&#039;ll find the first link is to the MIcrosoft Tweak page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft does offer a utility that allows for some customizing. It&#8217;s called Tweak. It&#8217;s not as customized as  an alternative registry but it does have a lot of otherwise undocumented features. Undocumented as far as the public is concerned. Search google for &#8220;windows tweak&#8221; and you&#8217;ll find the first link is to the MIcrosoft Tweak page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Bombs!</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Bombs!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 registry hacks to improve Windows&#8217; Perfomance - Sumesh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 registry hacks to improve Windows&#8217; Perfomance &#8211; Sumesh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for 22-July-2007 : -&#124; Life Rocks! 2.0 &#124;- Technology, Internet, Blogging, Life and Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for 22-July-2007 : -&#124; Life Rocks! 2.0 &#124;- Technology, Internet, Blogging, Life and Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 Windows Registry hacks for improved performance -Tech Zilo has a great article on improving performace with windows registry hacks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 Windows Registry hacks for improved performance -Tech Zilo has a great article on improving performace with windows registry hacks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-102</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DQ Khanh&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for dropping by.

&lt;strong&gt;Ashwini&lt;/strong&gt;, Microsoft doesn&#039;t give customised registry because all of us want different hacks, and it is not possible for them to do it all. Besides, the registry they provide is pretty much one-size-fits-them-all.

As for the risk, all hacks are risky, but Registry is open to use because MS knows it isn&#039;t that dangerous.

I have also given a note that you should backup the registry, in case anything goes wrong. Play it safe!

&lt;strong&gt;Linu&lt;/strong&gt;, hacks DO NOT affect others, that&#039;s why MS opened up the registry for hacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DQ Khanh</strong>, thanks for dropping by.</p>
<p><strong>Ashwini</strong>, Microsoft doesn&#8217;t give customised registry because all of us want different hacks, and it is not possible for them to do it all. Besides, the registry they provide is pretty much one-size-fits-them-all.</p>
<p>As for the risk, all hacks are risky, but Registry is open to use because MS knows it isn&#8217;t that dangerous.</p>
<p>I have also given a note that you should backup the registry, in case anything goes wrong. Play it safe!</p>
<p><strong>Linu</strong>, hacks DO NOT affect others, that&#8217;s why MS opened up the registry for hacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linu</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Linu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-110</guid>
		<description>some Registry Hacks may improve the system performance, but it may effect some other function...

so as Ashwini said, when playing with registry hacks there is always a risk involved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some Registry Hacks may improve the system performance, but it may effect some other function&#8230;</p>
<p>so as Ashwini said, when playing with registry hacks there is always a risk involved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rewarding blog readers - Part 1 : Tips, News, Opinions by ReviewSaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rewarding blog readers - Part 1 : Tips, News, Opinions by ReviewSaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] Improve the performance of windows â€“ By [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Improve the performance of windows â€“ By [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwini</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-101</guid>
		<description>why don&#039;t then Microsoft directly give &quot;customized&quot; registries if they can improve performance?

There might be a risk involved...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why don&#8217;t then Microsoft directly give &#8220;customized&#8221; registries if they can improve performance?</p>
<p>There might be a risk involved&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dang Quoc Khanh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dang Quoc Khanh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-100</guid>
		<description>That is good. Thank for share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is good. Thank for share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-104</guid>
		<description>I wanted to improve quality, and hopefully I have done that!

I copied nav links from old theme, so there was mismatch. Fixed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to improve quality, and hopefully I have done that!</p>
<p>I copied nav links from old theme, so there was mismatch. Fixed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linu</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Linu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Sumesh I noticed, on Top Right, Menu, Links of Feed, Links and Poll don&#039;t match with the style of Home Contact.

By checking your source code, I found you have not apllied tha css class for

I think you have to put this class=&quot;page_item&quot; to make Feed, Links and Poll look like Home and Contact Links

Linu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sumesh I noticed, on Top Right, Menu, Links of Feed, Links and Poll don&#8217;t match with the style of Home Contact.</p>
<p>By checking your source code, I found you have not apllied tha css class for</p>
<p>I think you have to put this class=&#8221;page_item&#8221; to make Feed, Links and Poll look like Home and Contact Links</p>
<p>Linu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linu</title>
		<link>http://www.techzilo.com/4-windows-registry-hacks-for-improved-performance/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Linu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techzilo.com/?p=81#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Wow... Sumesh
Glad to see you back.. with a fresh look and fresh content..
Good Job

Linu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; Sumesh<br />
Glad to see you back.. with a fresh look and fresh content..<br />
Good Job</p>
<p>Linu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
